Frontline Analysis of Terrorist Attacks of September 11 Essay

Cutting edge Analysis of Terrorist Attacks of September 11 - Essay Example The primary discussion that is point by point inside this program is the absence of correspondence between US associations, for example, the FBI and CIA. Previous FBI operator, Ali Soufan is met in this program and he depicts how the CIA retained data from the FBI which could have halted the fear monger assaults on September eleventh. As per Soufan, he mentioned data from the CIA on a few events before the assaults since he was dealing with another fear based oppressor assault that had happened on the USS Cole in Yemen and was battling to make sense of explicit associations between psychological militant groups(â€Å"The Interrogator,† 2011). Be that as it may, the CIA disregarded the entirety of his solicitations, however after September eleventh, 2001, they out of nowhere started to give him records and photos which, on the off chance that he had been offered access to these sources prior, he accepts that the FBI would have had the option to find the individuals engaged with 9/11 and at last had the option to stop it. Ali Soufan didn't generally comprehend why he was overlooked before, yet a great many people assume that it had to do with miscommunication in that the CIA may have believed that the FBI and different offices previously approached this information(â€Å"The Interrogator,† 2011). There is a ton of â€Å"what ifs† in this specific debate as individuals envision what the United States and the world may appear as though today if these two significant organizations had been exceptional at speaking with one another. There were different issues with correspondence too when it came to cross examination procedures. Ali Soufan was one of the FBI’s chief questioners in view of his capacity to communicate in Arabic. He had invested a lot of energy addressing psychological oppressor subjects; notwithstanding, after September eleventh, 2001, the United States chose to start utilizing upgraded cross examination procedures which incl uded water boarding, nakedness, lack of sleep, and no toilets. Ali Soufan didn't concur with these strategies since he trusted them to be incapable in contrast with his own strategy for addressing. At last, Soufan and others like him were supplanted by specialists in improved cross examination methods. Soufan endeavored to impart his interests about this, however nobody truly tuned in. He even talked before the legislature with his personality hid that there were a lot of models which outlined that strategies like water-boarding accomplished more mischief than anything as fear based oppressors just give out bogus data so as to stop what some consider to be torture(â€Å"The Interrogator,† 2011). The debate here stems from the way that Soufan accepts that no critical data has been gathered from detained psychological militants utilizing these extreme cross examination methods. Notwithstanding, those on the opposite side of the contention, for example, Dick Cheney, keep on shie lding these strategies and state that they have had the option to impede numerous potential fear monger assaults as a result of it. The normal American will never know reality since this controversey has all the earmarks of being to a greater degree a distinction of conclusion than everything else with each side saying that the other isn't right. The normal American is likewise probably not going to know about the controversey that encompasses how much cash has been spent on counter-psychological oppression endeavors and a definitive effect that these endeavors have had on halting